Cialis online
Please wait. Redirecting to RSA Projects blog.

Taking the long view

September 3, 2009 by Sam McLean
Filed under: Philosophy, Politics, Public Policy 

For Deleuze, Nietzsche was the great anti-Hegelian. And while profoundly at odds with one another in rather fundamental ways, both Nietzsche and Hegel would nevertheless have agreed that truth is often hidden within its apparent opposite. This principle has important implications for how we understand social processes and events, and also how we evaluate them. Both Nietzsche and Hegel teach us to take what Max Weber called “the long view” (see his great essay, “Science as a Vocation”) in which we assess events in relation to their long-term impact on culture and society.

The global economic crisis may provide us with an interesting case study. With unemployment figures moving beyond the 2.4 million mark and the IFS predicting real term cuts to public spending of 7 per cent from 2011, it is difficult to shape a positive story out the global recession. But from very different perspectives, recent speakers at RSA, the economist Nassim Taleb and the communitarian philosopher Amitai Etzioni both warn against viewing the near collapse of the global financial system as an unambiguous disaster. For both, the economic crisis may have profound and positive long-term benefits.

For Taleb, the long-term benefit might turn out to be a fundamental change in economic policy built around growing recognition that a robust global financial system needs to produce frequent crashes – but with citizens immune to them – rather than infrequent total collapses that cannot be coped with. And for Etzioni, the current economic crisis holds the possibility  for a “radical transformation” in the cultural value-systems of the UK and US with “communitarian and transcendental pursuits” replacing consumerism as our dominant modes of living and evaluating ‘success’.

While certainly attracted to aspects of Etzioni’s work and thinking, it is not my intention to validate the substance of his views; less still Taleb’s. But what I do like is the focus of both on cultivating something like a ‘social imaginary’ (see Charles Taylor’s essay) in which we turn the economic crisis into a condition of possibility for making positive and fundamental changes to society and the lives we lead.

It is improbable but not impossible that the consensus in fifty years time will be to interpret the collapse of Lehman Brothers as a kind of political ground-zero in at least two important respects: First, the precise point in which the emergence of a new progressive politics and social philosophy of the common good became possible. Second, the precise moment  neo-liberal orthodoxy in public and economic policy self-destructed and unmasked itself as a deranged mythology driven not by the ‘rationality’ of the market but the ideology of homo economicus and its impoverished conception of people not as citizens but consumers (see the last of Michael Sandel’s Reith Lectures this year).

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Comments

5 Comments on Taking the long view

  1. sandra742 on Wed, 9th Sep 2009 2:57 pm

    2. Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. :) Cheers! Sandra. R.

  2. lilikindsli on Wed, 30th Sep 2009 6:23 am

    3. n61SFQ I want to say – thank you for this!

  3. lilikindsli on Thu, 1st Oct 2009 12:39 am

    4. 32tXKd I want to say – thank you for this!

  4. Josh W on Sun, 1st Nov 2009 6:09 pm

    5. Hmm. I thought Nietzsche was fundamentally opposed to taking the long view, in that he thought that we should focus on our personal valuations of what is good right now (principle of infinite return etc).

    But on the more up to date stuff I agree with you; a crisis that destroys an old way of looking at the world opens up the opportunities for every sidelined paradigm to make it’s race for the top, but particularly for those that take in the full consequences of what we now know about the economies functioning to heart.

  5. Sam McLean on Mon, 2nd Nov 2009 3:13 pm

    6. Thanks for your post Josh.

    I tend to agree with Deleuze and Foucault when they warn against saying ‘this is the real Nietzsche’. But, yes, there is much in his writings that suggests precisely what you say.

    My point is more that Nietzsche shows us that the most common or obvious interpretation (the short view) is frequently lacking. I’m thinking, for example, of the early pages of “Beyond Good and Evil” when he muses about the critical and vital role of ‘evil’ to a society in the long-term. More over, the ‘long view’ is not necessarily in opposition to the kind of unmediated experience (’the dyonisian spirit’) Nietzsche consistently affirms.

Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!